Carol Croydon sounds like not a very nice person

[neurotrashboy]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/leicestershire/3485781.stm

Its bad enough killing her husband. (Why couldnt she just leave him?)

Its worse that she did it by stabbing him 22 times. (Even if she
genuinely believed it was necessary to do it at all, wouldnt once have
been enough?)

But what was truly reprehensible is that having done it, she tried to
drop her boyfriend in the shit. (Oh - so she was cheating on her
"abusive" husband, then?)

And when the police werent buying her story, she invented the mystery
couple and their kinky game that ended in tragedy. And when *that*
excuse failed to fly, she fell back on the old "I just flipped out for a
moment" ploy.

Amazingly this last expedient worked, at least upon the more susceptible
- because Justice for Women is campaigning to give her a Get Out of Jail
Free on the grounds that she "killed her husband out of desperation".

My question to "Justice" for Women is this: why is it not OK for a man
to beat his wife up, but it is OK for a woman to stab her husband 22
times?

Hint: the answer "because someone else gave her a hard time decades
ago" doesnt count *even if it is true*. Can you see why?

[auuV]

Post by neurotrashboy
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/leicestershire/3485781.stm
Its bad enough killing her husband. (Why couldnt she just leave him?)

There seems to be a suggestion that the £300,000 marital home
(inheritance of) might have been a factor.

Post by neurotrashboy
Its worse that she did it by stabbing him 22 times. (Even if she
genuinely believed it was necessary to do it at all, wouldnt once have
been enough?)

I'd have been prepared to believe that it was a frenzy - once she
started, shock, emotion, or God-knows-what meant that she was in the
grip of a frenzy and couldn't stop - but that doesn't fit with the fact
that she had the presence of mind to tie him up after she had violently
killed him.

Post by neurotrashboy
But what was truly reprehensible is that having done it, she tried to
drop her boyfriend in the shit. (Oh - so she was cheating on her
"abusive" husband, then?)

Her boyfriend apparently stood by her during the trial. With
girlfriends like that, who needs enemies?

Post by neurotrashboy
And when the police werent buying her story, she invented the mystery
couple and their kinky game that ended in tragedy. And when *that*
excuse failed to fly, she fell back on the old "I just flipped out for a
moment" ploy.

Even though she had brought the cheese knife from jbex with her! I
mean, she might have been able to explain away the ties (although tying
him up after he was dead kind of put the kibosh on that).

Post by neurotrashboy
Amazingly this last expedient worked, at least upon the more susceptible
- because Justice for Women is campaigning to give her a Get Out of Jail
Free on the grounds that she "killed her husband out of desperation".

JfW ought to keep their powder dry for use in genuine cases. They have
done themselves no favours at all.

Post by neurotrashboy
My question to "Justice" for Women is this: why is it not OK for a man
to beat his wife up, but it is OK for a woman to stab her husband 22
times?
Hint: the answer "because someone else gave her a hard time decades
ago" doesnt count *even if it is true*. Can you see why?

Wuite.

[Major Malcontent]

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 04:51:28 +0000, neurotrashboy

Post by neurotrashboy
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/leicestershire/3485781.stm
Its bad enough killing her husband. (Why couldnt she just leave him?)
Its worse that she did it by stabbing him 22 times. (Even if she
genuinely believed it was necessary to do it at all, wouldnt once have
been enough?)
But what was truly reprehensible is that having done it, she tried to
drop her boyfriend in the shit. (Oh - so she was cheating on her
"abusive" husband, then?)
And when the police werent buying her story, she invented the mystery
couple and their kinky game that ended in tragedy. And when *that*
excuse failed to fly, she fell back on the old "I just flipped out for a
moment" ploy.
Amazingly this last expedient worked, at least upon the more susceptible
- because Justice for Women is campaigning to give her a Get Out of Jail
Free on the grounds that she "killed her husband out of desperation".
My question to "Justice" for Women is this: why is it not OK for a man
to beat his wife up, but it is OK for a woman to stab her husband 22
times?
Hint: the answer "because someone else gave her a hard time decades
ago" doesnt count *even if it is true*. Can you see why?

You still cling to this Justice Thang, then?

No such thing.

Get a good Land Shark, they know that Justice is relative.

Life's a bitch. Then you die. Deal with it.

--
The Major

[neurotrashboy]

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:15:37 +0000, Major Malcontent

Post by Major Malcontent
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 04:51:28 +0000, neurotrashboy

Post by neurotrashboy
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/leicestershire/3485781.stm
Its bad enough killing her husband. (Why couldnt she just leave him?)
Its worse that she did it by stabbing him 22 times. (Even if she
genuinely believed it was necessary to do it at all, wouldnt once have
been enough?)
But what was truly reprehensible is that having done it, she tried to
drop her boyfriend in the shit. (Oh - so she was cheating on her
"abusive" husband, then?)
And when the police werent buying her story, she invented the mystery
couple and their kinky game that ended in tragedy. And when *that*
excuse failed to fly, she fell back on the old "I just flipped out for a
moment" ploy.
Amazingly this last expedient worked, at least upon the more susceptible
- because Justice for Women is campaigning to give her a Get Out of Jail
Free on the grounds that she "killed her husband out of desperation".
My question to "Justice" for Women is this: why is it not OK for a man
to beat his wife up, but it is OK for a woman to stab her husband 22
times?
Hint: the answer "because someone else gave her a hard time decades
ago" doesnt count *even if it is true*. Can you see why?

You still cling to this Justice Thang, then?

Perhaps "cling" is the wrong word.

Post by Major Malcontent
No such thing.

You tend to find exactly what you look for.

Thats worth bearing in mind, I think.

Post by Major Malcontent
Get a good Land Shark, they know that Justice is relative.
Life's a bitch. Then you die. Deal with it.

Perfection can never be achieved. This simple fact divides the world in
twain: into those who nevertheless strive for the best that *can* be
achieved, however little; and those who use the worlds imperfection as
a justification for their own evil, laziness or stupidity.

Im not saying that the latter group are *wrong* - merely that they are
antisocial cunts for whom I have nothing but contempt.